Ethics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Ethics - Assignment ExampleAnswers to Questions 1. What would you do if you were the acting CO of the submarine? What level of Kohlbergs moral reasoning is this decision based on? As indicated in Lesson 8, Kohlbergs theory assumes the primacy of cognition and defines a moral act as one that follows a process of moral reasoning and judgement based of principles (1). Kohlbergs six stages are enumerated as take aim 1 Preconventional Morality where demo 1 is indicated as Obedience and Punishment Orientation, Stage 2 is individuality and Exchange Level 2 Conventional Morality made up of Stage 3 skilful Interpersonal Relation commits and Stage 4 Maintaining the Social Order finall(a)y, Level 3 Postconventional Morality composed of Stage 5 Social Contract and Individual Rights and Stage 6 Universal Principles (Crain). Upon evaluation of each levels and correspondent stages, one can deduce that the decision to close the cut across in this particular scenario falls on a lower floor Le vel 3 Postconventional Morality where both rules of law are considered and the possibilities of considering the universality of ethical principles. To answer the question, what would you do if you were the acting CO of the submarine?, it is not simply a matter of stating that one would order the hatch to be closed immediately without taking into consideration a number of factors. For one, the only other info noted from the case facts is that there would be three people who would die within a second of closing the hatch. However, the number of people that would be saved was not indicated. A quick research on the clean number of on a submarine revealed that the crew of a Canadian naval ship must be not more than 165 personnel (National Defense and Canadian Forces 16). Assuming that this is the average number of personnel on a navy warship, by closing the hatch, the CO would apparently be saving 162 people. Using Kohlbergs moral reasoning, under Level 3, a review of the laws govern ing naval warfare ships indicate that as part of damage control the moral is HOLD WHAT YOU HAVE DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO PREVENT PROGRESSIVE FLOODING AND BURNING (Sea Cadets. org 14). Further, the mission of the Canadian Maritine Ships (CMS) is is to maintain maritime and appoint air forces on each coast able to respond to maritime incidents, contribute to the surveillance of Canadian approaches, and assist in the tracking of ships of interest, such as ships involved in illegal activity or posing a possible threat to national interests or security (National Defense and Canadian Forces 6). . Therefore, all personnel are aware that there are risks involved in manning naval warships and the priority is forever and a day to ensure that the ships is ultimately saved and preserved at the top of the agenda. The COs responsibility is lodge by the mission that Canadas navy versatile, multipurpose and combat-capable diligently protects our interests by safeguarding our maritime approach es, exercising sovereignty over our waters, protecting our offshore natural resources and contributing to global security (Canadian Navy par. 1). In this regard, as CO, I will order to close the hatch at the earliest possible time to interrupt progressive flooding. Presuming the consequential risks of the three men within the